Prostate Cancer can be Identified in Urine Test

Prostate cancer’s new biomarker has been determined that can be found in tissue and urine samples. Scientists at Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, have identified a set of RNA molecules apparent in prostate cancer sufferers but not in men without this cancer. They presented their results in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.images (1)

Presently, testing for prostate cancer comprises of testing for high levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in blood samples. These PSA tests are usually adopted by a biopsy to ensure the presence of cancer.

On the other hand, the PSA test is regarded to be imperfect, and in 2013 the American Urological Association suggested against PSA tests being provided regularly.

Medical director of the Global Robotics Institute Dr. Vipul Patel, describes:

“While enhanced PSA can be an alert to a lethal cancer, it can also identify less aggressive cancers that may certainly not do any damage.

In addition, only 1/4th of men with increased PSA levels that have a biopsy in fact have prostate cancer. Prostate cancer requires to be tested for; we just require discovering a superior biomarker.”

The RNA molecules that the Sanford-Burnham scientists have recognized are “long noncoding RNAs” (lncRNAs). Until recently, the usefulness of lncRNAs had not been appreciated by researchers, who ignored the non-coding molecules as “non-functional disturbance in the genome.”

lncRNAs are now considered to regulate cellular development. Proof is also increasing that lncRNAs may play a role to a wide variety of conditions, such as cancer.

lncRNAs were raised in prostate cancer sufferer samples throughout three distinct groups:

  • Human prostate cancer cell lines and usual prostate epithelial cells
  • Prostate adenocarcinoma tissue samples and matched up regular tissue samples
  • Urine samples from sufferers with prostate cancer or harmless prostate hypoplasia, and normal healthy people.

In each group, prostate cancer sufferers showed higher levels of lncRNAs in comparison with healthy control people.

Ranjan J. Perera, PhD and associate professor stated “We have recognized a set of lncRNAs that show up to have an essential role in prostate cancer diagnostics,”.

“The outcomes improve our understanding of the role of lncRNAs in cancer biology and, significantly, extend the possibility to use lncRNAs as biomarkers to identify prostate cancer,” Perera adds.

Due to the fact the lncRNAs are simply recognized in urine samples, prostate cancer testing could become more available than it presently is with blood tests.

Dr. Patel concludes:

“There is a remarkable unmet clinical require for better non-invasive testing tools for early diagnosis of prostate cancer to decrease the overtreatment and deaths of this condition. Our results signify a ensuring approach to fulfil this need.”

Other latest suggested solutions to the PSA test consist of an “electronic noise” developed to distinguish between prostate cancer and harmless prostatic hyperplasia, which share identical diagnostic properties.